Aislingeach wrote:
In my notes from the other side, I have the following:
"There's a simple trick I figured out to know if you need "cuid" or not. If you can say, in English, "I have a X" then in Irish you can say "mo X". "I have a car," for example, is fine, so "mo charr" is too. But you can't say "I have a clothes" or "I have a hair" (well you can but it doesn't mean the same thing as "I have hair") so you have to say "mo chuid éadaigh" and "mo chuid gruaige."
No idea as to the validity, and I can't remember who said it, but it made sense to me.
That really just distinguishes owning one thing as opposed to owning more than one thing ('hair' is different, I suppose).
You wouldn't say
mo chuid lámh for 'my hands' and it doesn't fit into the bracket of 'I have a X', obviously, because it's plural.
I agree with translating
mo chuid as
my share when relating to potentially differing amounts from one person to another. It's a bit like saying 'my alloted amount (of hair etc.)'. 'Hands' on the other hand don't tend to differ from one person to another, except in very exceptional circumstances.
[Even if you accept what i say above, I can tell you that I have been surprised before by something that appears to contradict the above - I think we came across something like 'mo chuid súl' before].