It is currently Wed 07 Oct 2026 12:35 pm

All times are UTC


Forum rules


Please click here to view the forum rules



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: Damascus
PostPosted: Thu 25 Oct 2012 9:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue 06 Sep 2011 7:18 pm
Posts: 576
Lughaidh wrote:
Quote:
Damaisc was the dative of Damascus in the Bardic Standard (or Classical Irish or Early Modern Irish, whatever one wants to call it).


it's surprising, because the masculine dative of nouns is never formed by making the last consonant(s) slender. That's rather something that happens with feminine nouns (2nd declension). Almost no masculine noun changes in the dative case in Modern Irish (I can think of 1 example: teach which becomes toigh in Ulster in the dative).


Damascus - nominative
Damaisc - Dative

....seriously!? How many other words follow this pattern in Old Irish? No, I'm no expert, but one looks like the original Latin to me and the second one Irish (Gaelicised).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Damascus
PostPosted: Thu 25 Oct 2012 9:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun 04 Sep 2011 11:02 pm
Posts: 1581
As already noted, the Irish Bible translators tried in many (most?) cases to stick close to native pronunciation, as well as that can be approximated in Irish in a given case, so dimashq was probably what they were trying to reproduce with damaisc. It even extends to things like the word "Amen". You often see it written as Áméin, which looks very much like an attempt to reproduce the Hebrew pronunciation, rather than mimicking the English pronunciation.

_________________
I'm not a native (or entirely fluent) speaker, so be sure to wait for confirmations/corrections, especially for tattoos.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Damascus
PostPosted: Fri 26 Oct 2012 12:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 12:06 pm
Posts: 2436
Quote:
Damascus - nominative
Damaisc - Dative

....seriously!? How many other words follow this pattern in Old Irish? No, I'm no expert, but one looks like the original Latin to me and the second one Irish (Gaelicised).


you read too quickly maybe.

Latin Damascus should have become Damasc in Old Irish
Irish Damaisc should have come from Latin Damasci (or Damascis or something else with an -i-), which can't be a dative in my opinion. And anyway no masculine noun makes its dative case by making slender the last consonant(s) (except 1 exception: teach > toigh).
So there's a problem...

_________________
Is fearr Gaeilg na Gaeltaċta ná Gaeilg ar biṫ eile
Agus is í Gaeilg Ġaoṫ Doḃair is binne
:)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Damascus
PostPosted: Fri 26 Oct 2012 5:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun 28 Aug 2011 6:15 pm
Posts: 3594
Location: An Astráil
Lughaidh wrote:
Quote:
Damascus - nominative
Damaisc - Dative

....seriously!? How many other words follow this pattern in Old Irish? No, I'm no expert, but one looks like the original Latin to me and the second one Irish (Gaelicised).

you read too quickly maybe.

Latin Damascus should have become Damasc in Old Irish
Irish Damaisc should have come from Latin Damasci (or Damascis or something else with an -i-), which can't be a dative in my opinion. And anyway no masculine noun makes its dative case by making slender the last consonant(s) (except 1 exception: teach > toigh).
So there's a problem...

Perhaps the "problem" is a result of mistakenly believing the Irish came from the Latin. :LOL:

_________________
Múinteoir Gaeilge - Irish Teacher
My "specialty" is Connemara Irish, particularly Cois Fhairrge dialect, but I can also speak Ulster and Munster Irish with native-level pronunciation.
Is fearr Gaeilge ḃriste ná Béarla cliste, cinnte, aċ i ḃfad níos fearr aríst í Gaeilge ḃinn ḃeo na nGaeltaċtaí.
Gaeilge Chonnacht (GC), go háraid Gaeilge Chois Fhairrge (GCF), Gaeilic Uladh (GU), Gaelainn na Mumhan (GM), agus Gaeilge an Chaighdeáin Oifigiúil (CO).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Damascus
PostPosted: Fri 26 Oct 2012 11:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 12:06 pm
Posts: 2436
Quote:
Perhaps the "problem" is a result of mistakenly believing the Irish came from the Latin.


What language would have Old Irish borrowed "Damaisc" from, if it isn't Latin?

_________________
Is fearr Gaeilg na Gaeltaċta ná Gaeilg ar biṫ eile
Agus is í Gaeilg Ġaoṫ Doḃair is binne
:)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Damascus
PostPosted: Fri 26 Oct 2012 1:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri 30 Sep 2011 10:08 pm
Posts: 1313
Lughaidh wrote:
it's surprising, because the masculine dative of nouns is never formed by making the last consonant(s) slender.

Could it have been one of the few 2nd declension masculine nouns like im, or sliabh maybe? Or perhaps I have it wrong.

Peadar Ua Laoghaire has the following in Críos Mac Dé, Caibideal a naoi:
In aimsir ár Slánaitheóra bhí Iúdaígh ’na gcónaí anso ’s ansúd ar fuaid na ndúthaí, ins gach aon bhall, chómh fada ó thuaidh le Damascus agus le hAntioch agus i bhfad soir ó sna háiteannaibh sin, leis.
Damascus doesn't have a dative here (after le) so perhaps you are right. Maybe Damaisc was created in modern times, but traditionally it was Damascus, I should check Bedell's Bible.

Quote:
Almost no masculine noun changes in the dative case in Modern Irish (I can think of 1 example: teach which becomes toigh in Ulster in the dative).

That's cool. So in Ulster it has all three cases:
An teach
Fear an tí
i dtoigh


Is this right?

_________________
The dialect I use is Cork Irish.
Ar sgáth a chéile a mhairid na daoine, lag agus láidir, uasal is íseal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Damascus
PostPosted: Fri 26 Oct 2012 1:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri 09 Mar 2012 6:16 pm
Posts: 1527
Lughaidh wrote:
Quote:
Damascus - nominative
Damaisc - Dative

....seriously!? How many other words follow this pattern in Old Irish? No, I'm no expert, but one looks like the original Latin to me and the second one Irish (Gaelicised).


you read too quickly maybe.

Latin Damascus should have become Damasc in Old Irish


I agree, theoritically if Damasc was taken into Old Irish, than Damascus should have been Damasc. The apocapy of latin terminations (i.e "us"; "um" etc..) of loanwards, where the "us" was knocked off, was common practise in Old Irish, so, Latin: *Bacallum (staff) --> Old. Ir Bachall

Lughaidh wrote:
Irish Damaisc should have come from Latin Damasci (or Damascis or something else with an -i-), which can't be a dative in my opinion. And anyway no masculine noun makes its dative case by making slender the last consonant(s) (except 1 exception: teach > toigh).
So there's a problem...


I agree here also, old Irish o-stems (first declention of modern Irish, where nouns ended in a broad consonant e.g fear > old.Ir fer) were broadened in the old Irish dative. So "Fer" would be "Fiur" in the the old. Ir Dative singular. Usually more modern representations of the real dative of Fear would have been "Fior" as often the "u" morphed into "o", this is very archaic now though, but still the dative plurl still exists: feraibh--> Fearaibh.

_________________
Is Fearr súil romhainn ná ḋá ṡúil inár ndiaiḋ
(Amhlaoibh Ó Súilleabháin)

Please wait for corrections/ more input from other forum members before acting on advice


I'm familiar with Munster Irish/ Gaolainn na Mumhan (GM) and the Official Standard/an Caighdeán Oifigiúil (CO)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Damascus
PostPosted: Fri 26 Oct 2012 2:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri 30 Sep 2011 10:08 pm
Posts: 1313
Actually, could anybody recommend a good source for the declensions in Classical Irish. There are some great ones for Old Irish, like David Stifter's Sengoidelc or SeanGhaeilge gan dua ag Pádraig Ó Fhiannachta, but I don't know of one for Classical Irish.

_________________
The dialect I use is Cork Irish.
Ar sgáth a chéile a mhairid na daoine, lag agus láidir, uasal is íseal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Damascus
PostPosted: Fri 26 Oct 2012 3:07 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu 15 Sep 2011 12:06 pm
Posts: 2436
You'll find some in 'Stair na Gaeilge' and in 'Grammar of Ulster Irish in 1600' (that's not the right title but it's something like that, but anyway it's Classical Irish, it's very different from modern Ulster Irish).

Quote:
That's cool. So in Ulster it has all three cases:
An teach
Fear an tí
i dtoigh

Is this right?


teach
toí / toighe /ti:/
toigh /ti/

You can use "toigh" alone without "i" : bhí mé toigh Hiúdaí. I think you can also say "Chuaigh mé toigh Hiúdaí".

_________________
Is fearr Gaeilg na Gaeltaċta ná Gaeilg ar biṫ eile
Agus is í Gaeilg Ġaoṫ Doḃair is binne
:)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Damascus
PostPosted: Fri 26 Oct 2012 9:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun 28 Aug 2011 6:15 pm
Posts: 3594
Location: An Astráil
Lughaidh wrote:
Quote:
Perhaps the "problem" is a result of mistakenly believing the Irish came from the Latin.

What language would have Old Irish borrowed "Damaisc" from, if it isn't Latin?

Maybe a wandering Saracen told them the proper pronunciation was Dimashq. :LOL:

_________________
Múinteoir Gaeilge - Irish Teacher
My "specialty" is Connemara Irish, particularly Cois Fhairrge dialect, but I can also speak Ulster and Munster Irish with native-level pronunciation.
Is fearr Gaeilge ḃriste ná Béarla cliste, cinnte, aċ i ḃfad níos fearr aríst í Gaeilge ḃinn ḃeo na nGaeltaċtaí.
Gaeilge Chonnacht (GC), go háraid Gaeilge Chois Fhairrge (GCF), Gaeilic Uladh (GU), Gaelainn na Mumhan (GM), agus Gaeilge an Chaighdeáin Oifigiúil (CO).


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 20 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 662 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group