Saoirse wrote:
franc 91 wrote:
Don't get me wrong, I think it's a very good thing that each version is expressed in language that is as natural and authentic as possible and that it isn't just a carbon copy of the other one. I wasn't under the impression that it was a text for beginners. As I understand it, the author has a good feel for Irish.
Then I'd say it was a case of keeping it close to the original, more than the gist, but keeping it natural to each language.
For literature, a good translation should read like a natural native paasage in the target language, but it is also necessary to try to retain the originality of the piece that exists in the source language. Usually literary works in any language are interesting because of their unusual turns of phrase not because they are ordinary. That is one reason literature isn't that great as a learning material.
At the opposite extreme, textbooks can be so literal as to be misleading (that's why I try to give a literal translation as well as an idiomatic one when explaining things here). For instance, my Japanese students found the English translations in Buntús Cainte confusing because they were a bit too literal and only made sense if you were familiar with Hiberno-English.